Traditional and modern strategies

How Do We Rebuild a Damaged Tooth?

A root-treated tooth can be rebuilt in many ways, from a cast gold post and crown to a bonded restoration that removes almost nothing. Both have saved teeth for decades. The skill lies in knowing which one your tooth needs, and in protecting it from your bite afterwards.

HomeServicesHow Do We Rebuild a Damaged Tooth?
Dr. Mamaly Reshad
Dr. Mamaly Reshad · Prosthodontist
Former USC Chairman · 30+ years · The dentist that dentists trust
Book

Do you still need a post?

Many root-treated teeth no longer need a post. Modern bonding can rebuild them while keeping far more of the tooth.

Heavily broken-down teeth often still need posts, crowns, gold restorations or crown lengthening. These remain some of the most reliable treatments in dentistry.

Dr. Reshad has practised and taught both approaches for over two decades, so the choice is made for your tooth, not for a technique.

Evidence, sense, experience

“The most savage controversies are those about matters as to which there is no good evidence either way.” — Bertrand Russell

How to restore a root-treated tooth has been argued over for decades, and good evidence is not always available. Sound treatment planning rests on three things together.

Evidence

What the research shows, including the studies published since 2013 summarised on this page.

Common sense

The mechanics of the tooth: how much is left, where the forces go, and what will fail first.

Clinical experience

Cases followed for ten, twenty and in some cases over thirty years, including the ones that did not go to plan.

Part one

Why root-treated teeth fail

Why these teeth break, and what gives them a firm foundation.

Ready to talk it through?

Our Beverly Hills office at 414 N. Camden Dr., Suite 750 opens in January 2027. Until then, call (310) 444-5217 and we'll arrange your consultation.

The ferrule

The single most important factor is the ferrule: a collar of sound tooth above the gum, ideally about 1 mm thick and 2 mm high, all the way around. The crown hugs this collar like the metal band on a wooden tool handle, and it is what stops the tooth splitting.

When a tooth has broken to the gum line, there is nothing for the crown to grip. Rather than removing it, the root can be gently extruded with a small orthodontic appliance over a few weeks, bringing healthy tooth up into view. This works as long as enough root remains in the bone: at least as much root as crown, and ideally more.

The ferrule in under a minute: what it is, why it matters, and what to do when there is none.
Ferrule createdThe new crown now has sound tooth to hugGum linestays where it isFerrulecollar of sound tooth, ~2 mmEnough root must remain in bone: at least 1:1, ideally 2:1
Ferrule height 2.0 mm
Creating a ferrule by orthodontic extrusionThe tooth is gently pulled up; the bone and gum stay where they are. Illustration built on a photograph of a natural incisor.

Saving a front tooth with rapid extrusion

TraditionalOrthodontic extrusion11 years
The failed crown: a post, but no ferrule
Before The crown failed because no healthy tooth remained above the gum.
Orthodontic appliance with temporaries
Extrusion A small appliance pulls the root down over a few weeks.
Root extruded
Exposed Healthy tooth now sits above the gum.
Prepared teeth with new ferrule
Ferrule A proper collar for the new crown to grip.
Final restorations
Result The tooth was saved and an implant avoided.
Final restorations close-up
11 years Still functioning at eleven years.

When a post splits the root

A root is not solid. It is a slightly flexible tube that thins in places. Put a large, rigid post inside it, under a rigid crown, with no ferrule, and every bite wedges the root from the inside. Over years this fatigue can crack it. Once a crack runs below the bone, the tooth cannot be restored, and the dark shadow it leaves in the bone on an x-ray is often how it is found.

Wide rigid post, no ferruleStress concentrates; the root cracksFerrule and fibre postStress is shared; the root survives
How a rigid post can wedge a root apartSchematic. Illustration built on a photograph of a natural incisor.
Extracted root split by a post
Split root A rigid post with no ferrule cracked this root down the middle.
X-ray showing bone loss from a root fracture
X-ray The dark area in the bone is damage caused by a root fracture.
Extracted molar with a large post
Extracted A molar lost to a large-diameter post.
Crown and post removed from a cracked incisor
Upper incisor A classic pattern in front teeth with big posts.

A lesson from 1975

Archive caseCantilever bridge

This patient came to Dr. Reshad with x-rays going back to 1975. A wide, rigid gold post had been placed and joined to the neighbouring teeth, with a small cantilever extension at the back. This was before implants, and splinting everything together was thought to add stability. A cantilever magnifies biting force, and by 1978 the post had wedged the root apart.

X-ray 1975
1975 Large rigid post supporting a cantilevered bridge.
X-ray 1978
1978 Three years later: a fractured root and dark bone loss around it.
X-ray of front teeth with large posts
Upper incisors Big posts in thin roots, typical of failures in the front teeth.
Front teeth with posts and fractured roots
Clinical view Cracked roots that could not be saved.
Denture attached to root-treated teeth
Overload Root-treated teeth carrying a partial denture take a heavy load.
Ready to talk it through?

Our Beverly Hills office at 414 N. Camden Dr., Suite 750 opens in January 2027. Until then, call (310) 444-5217 and we'll arrange your consultation.

What weakens a tooth

The root canal itself takes very little strength from a tooth. The damage comes from what is cut away, and above all from losing the ridges of tooth along the sides that hold the cusps together.

Front teeth behave the same way. In laboratory studies by Magne and Douglas, each step of tooth removal made the crown of an incisor more flexible, even after it was restored.

0%25%50%75%100%Root canal accessRoot canal access: 5%5%Filling on topFilling on top: 20%20%Both side ridges lostBoth side ridges lost: 63%63%Relative loss of cuspal stiffness
How much stiffness a back tooth losesReeh, Messer & Douglas, J Endod 1989
Side walls lost, cusps unprotectedThe opposing cusp wedges the two halves apartCusps covered by an onlayThe force is spread across the onlay; the cusps are braced
Why cusps need protectingEvery bite drives the opposing tooth into the cavity like a wedge. Movement is exaggerated for clarity.
×1.0×1.5×2.0Intact toothIntact tooth: 1.00 times as flexible as intact×1.00Enamel removed between teethEnamel removed between teeth: 1.00 times as flexible as intact×1.00Front enamel, one thirdFront enamel, one third: 1.13 times as flexible as intact×1.13Small fillings between teethSmall fillings between teeth: 1.30 times as flexible as intact×1.30Root canal accessRoot canal access: 1.37 times as flexible as intact×1.37Front enamel, two thirdsFront enamel, two thirds: 1.40 times as flexible as intact×1.40All front enamel removedAll front enamel removed: 2.16 times as flexible as intact×2.16
Relative flexibility of an incisor crownIntact tooth = 1.0 · Magne & Douglas, Quintessence Int 2000
0%25%50%75%100%VeneerVeneer: 3–30%3–30%Full crownFull crown: 63–72%63–72%Tooth structure removed, by weight
How much tooth each preparation removesEdelhoff & Sorensen, J Prosthet Dent 2002
Preparations for posts and crowns
Most Posts and full crowns
Full crown preparations
More Full crown preparations
Minimal veneer preparation
Less A minimal veneer preparation
Bonded restoration with no preparation
Least Bonded, with almost no preparation

A post does not strengthen a tooth

In the 1970s it was believed that a post “reinforced” a root-treated tooth. Laboratory work by Guzy and Nicholls in 1979 showed it does not, and clinical studies since have agreed. A post's only job is to hold the core that retains the crown. When one is needed, it is because too little tooth remains to do that job.

7 of 8

Clinical trials found no benefit from placing a post. The ferrule and the remaining walls decided the outcome.

Naumann et al., J Endod 2018
No gain

A fibre post under a bonded overlay did not make root-treated molars any stronger.

Scotti et al., J Dent 2012
12%

Of post-restored teeth had complications over about six years across 12 studies and 2,784 teeth: loosening 5%, root fracture 3%.

Goodacre et al., J Prosthet Dent 2003

Whether a tooth can be saved at all, and how, depends on more than the post:

Tooth left

How much sound structure remains above the gum

Previous treatment

Damage from earlier fillings, crowns or large posts

Decay

Loss of tooth and deep margins under the gum

The bite

Heavy or poorly managed biting forces

Grinding

Bruxism multiplies the load; night guards matter

Its job

A tooth anchoring a partial denture or bridge end takes extra strain

This is where a prosthodontist earns their keep. Even a compromised tooth can survive for many years in a well-balanced bite.

Ready to talk it through?

Our Beverly Hills office at 414 N. Camden Dr., Suite 750 opens in January 2027. Until then, call (310) 444-5217 and we'll arrange your consultation.

The tooth in its coffin

Richard Simonsen described how teeth are usually lost: not in one event, but through a cycle of ever larger treatments, each reasonable at the time.

Healthy tooth: about 100% of natural tooth left (illustrative)Healthy tooth100%Filling: about 90% of natural tooth left (illustrative)Filling~90%Larger filling: about 74% of natural tooth left (illustrative)Larger filling~74%Root canal: about 68% of natural tooth left (illustrative)Root canal~68%Post: about 56% of natural tooth left (illustrative)Post~56%Crown: about 36% of natural tooth left (illustrative)Crown~36%Fracture: about 20% of natural tooth left (illustrative)Fracture~20%Extraction: about 0% of natural tooth left (illustrative)Extraction0%
The restorative cycleAfter Simonsen, JADA 1991. Shading shows the natural tooth left at each step. Illustrative.

That raises the central question in restoring these teeth. Do we build the strongest, most rigid restoration possible, or do we protect the tooth itself? For a badly broken-down tooth, a rigid post and crown may be the last resort that buys another ten or fifteen years, and that can be exactly the right choice. For a younger patient, or a tooth that is less damaged, keeping the tooth intact matters more.

Traditional: gold post, core and crownProven over decades · more tooth removedModern: bonded onlay, no postKeeps far more of your own tooth3 · RESTOREDGold coreGold postCrownFerruleBonded onlayDentin sealComposite coreYour own tooth
Traditional crown:
Two proven ways to restore a root-treated molarLower molar in section. Hatching shows tooth removed or already lost.
Part two

The traditional craft

Gold, posts, crowns and crown lengthening: for many patients, still the only way to keep their teeth.

Gold: the long-distance runner

Cast gold has served dentistry for over a century. It is kind to the opposing teeth, seals superbly, and does not depend on bonding. Its drawback is colour, which is why many patients no longer ask for it. On back teeth, and particularly second molars that take the heaviest loads, it remains an outstanding choice.

Gold restorations on back teeth
Gold onlays Partial-coverage gold keeps healthy tooth.
Gold partial coverage restorations occlusal view
Occlusal view Precise margins that last decades.
Impression for a gold restoration
Precision A detailed impression for a cast gold restoration.
73%

Of 2,071 gold inlays were still in place after 25 years in one specialist practice.

Erpenstein et al., Clin Oral Investig 2001
52 yrs

1,314 cast gold restorations from Dr. Richard Tucker's Seattle practice, some in service for over half a century.

Donovan et al., J Esthet Restor Dent 2004
69% vs 53%

Gold versus ceramic partial crowns still in place at 20 years in a randomised trial. The difference was not significant.

Cieplik et al., Dent Mater 2025
Ready to talk it through?

Our Beverly Hills office at 414 N. Camden Dr., Suite 750 opens in January 2027. Until then, call (310) 444-5217 and we'll arrange your consultation.

When there is no alternative

Bonding needs sound, healthy dentin and a dry field. Traditional restorations are the right choice when:

  • Very little tooth is left. A cast post and core may be the only way to hold a crown.
  • The dentin is poor. Old, sclerotic or heavily restored dentin does not bond reliably.
  • Margins are deep under the gum. If the area cannot be kept dry, a cemented crown is more predictable, sometimes after crown lengthening.
  • Decay risk is high. Gold's precise fit and seal make it a strong choice.
  • Access or isolation is difficult, or the bite is extreme.

A collapsed bite, rebuilt the traditional way

TraditionalExtrusionPosts and crownsMetal occlusion

This patient had ground through his teeth into the roots and bone, and his bite had collapsed. The aim was restoration integrity: rebuild his bite height and give him something strong enough to survive severe grinding.

Collapsed bite front view
Before Teeth worn into the roots; bite collapsed.
Worn teeth side view
Before Severe wear and broken teeth.
Full-mouth x-rays
X-rays Many teeth needed root treatment.
Extrusion attachments on roots
Extrusion Roots pulled up to create a ferrule.
Exposed tooth after extrusion
Ferrule Healthy tooth exposed for the crowns to grip.
Distalisation of a molar
Orthodontics A molar moved back to remove a pocket and avoid an implant.
Final result with night guard
Protection Metal biting surfaces and a night guard for a severe grinder.
Completed reconstruction
Completed The full reconstruction.

Rebuilding a bite this far gone takes the traditional toolkit: root treatment, posts, crowns and a rigid metal biting surface, protected by a night guard. For a heavy grinder with this much destruction, it is the treatment that keeps the teeth working.

Part three

Adhesive dentistry

Many teeth that once needed a root canal, post and crown can now be rebuilt with little or no drilling. Dr. Reshad has taught and developed these techniques for over two decades.

A paradigm shift

Classical crowns rely on retention and resistance form: the tooth is shaped with a drill so the crown holds on mechanically. They work, and they still have their place. Bonded restorations are glued to the tooth instead, so far less needs to be removed, and sometimes nothing at all.

Retention and resistance form
Classical crown preparations with a diamond bur cutting the tooth
Classical crown preparations are cut with a diamond bur. Bonded restorations need far less of this, and sometimes none.
YOUR NATURAL TOOTHTHE BONDED RESTORATIONEnamel → Porcelain or high-filled compositeEnamelHard, stiff outer shellPorcelain or high-filled compositeHard and wear-resistant, like enamelWhere enamel meets dentin → Immediate dentin sealWhere enamel meets dentinNature's shock absorberImmediate dentin sealBonded the moment the tooth is preparedDentin → Composite resinDentinResilient inner bodyComposite resinFlexes like dentin, protects the root
Bio-emulation: replacing like with likeEach layer is matched to the tissue it replaces
Stiffness (elastic modulus, GPa)0255075100EnamelEnamel: 80≈80PorcelainPorcelain: 60–7060–70DentinDentin: 14≈14CompositeComposite: 10–2010–20Thermal expansion (×10⁻⁶/°C)012.52537.550EnamelEnamel: 17≈17PorcelainPorcelain: 13–1613–16DentinDentin: 11≈11CompositeComposite: 20–4020–40
Materials that behave like toothApproximate published ranges

The idea is borrowed from engineering. Cars have crumple zones: the part designed to fail protects the passengers. In a bonded tooth, the restoration is that part. Stronger is not always better, because a restoration far stiffer than the tooth passes the load into the root.

Ready to talk it through?

Our Beverly Hills office at 414 N. Camden Dr., Suite 750 opens in January 2027. Until then, call (310) 444-5217 and we'll arrange your consultation.

Immediate dentin sealing

The key to a lasting bond is sealing the freshly cut dentin immediately, before impressions are taken, rather than weeks later when the final restoration is fitted. It protects the tooth in between and produces a much stronger, more durable bond.

0 MPa20 MPa40 MPa60 MPa80 MPaFreshly cut dentin (control)Freshly cut dentin (control): 56 MPa56 MPaSealed late, no IDSSealed late, no IDS: 12 MPa12 MPaImmediate seal, same dayImmediate seal, same day: 58 MPa58 MPaImmediate seal, 1 weekImmediate seal, 1 week: 67 MPa67 MPaImmediate seal, 12 weeksImmediate seal, 12 weeks: 60 MPa60 MPaMicrotensile bond strength, approximate
Bond strength to dentinApproximate values · Magne, So & Cascione, J Prosthet Dent 2007
Your own toothevery remaining wall keptRoot canal fillingfinishes cleanly at the chamber floorGlass-ionomer baseabout 2 mm, allows re-entry if ever neededComposite basea thin layer to even the floor and fill undercutsImmediate dentin sealbonded the moment the tooth is cutPorcelain or composite overlayabout 2 mm, covering every cusp6 · BONDED OVERLAY
How a bonded overlay is built on a root-treated molarLower molar in section, layer by layer. Adapted from Magne's protocol.

Front teeth, rebuilt without a post

When the old crown was removed from the incisor below, very little tooth remained. Traditionally this tooth would have needed a root canal, a rigid post, a crown and possibly crown lengthening surgery. Using immediate dentin sealing and a bonded porcelain restoration, none of that was needed. It was placed by Dr. Reshad over twenty years ago and is still in place.

A broken incisor, bonded instead of crowned

BondedImmediate dentin sealing20+ years
Old crown removed showing dark stump
Before Under the old crown.
Model of the tiny preparation
Preparation The remaining tooth is tiny compared with the restoration.
Tooth prepared and sealed
Sealed Dentin sealed immediately after preparation.
Try-in
Bonding The restoration bonded to the sealed tooth.
The finished smile: the bonded incisor blended in, the gap between the front teeth closed
Result Blended into the smile.
Palatal view
From behind A type IIIA restoration in Magne's classification.

Acid erosion, restored with almost no drilling

BondedMock-upFrontal-path veneers20+ years

This patient had lost a great deal of tooth to acid erosion from outside sources such as diet. A wax-up and a mock-up in the mouth let her approve the design first. The teeth were then prepared through the mock-up, so only what was needed was touched, and the dentin was sealed immediately.

Before: erosion
Before Worn, shortened teeth.
Putty matrix from wax-up
Plan A matrix made from the wax-up.
Mock-up in the mouth
Mock-up A preview she could approve.
Preparing through the mock-up
Preparation Drilling only through the mock-up.
Immediate dentin sealing
Sealed Minimal preparation, sealed immediately.
Porcelain veneers
Veneers Thin frontal-path veneers with small wings.
Veneers at seven years
7 years Intact at seven years.
Final result 20 years
20+ years Still in place after more than twenty years.
Porcelain veneer, about 0.5 mmbonded to enamel; wings wrap the sidesFrontal path of insertionone straight path, no undercutsIncisal wraprestores lost lengthBack of tooth untouched
The frontal-path veneerSlides straight on from the front and wraps the edge; small wings on each side also close dark gaps between teeth.
Ready to talk it through?

Our Beverly Hills office at 414 N. Camden Dr., Suite 750 opens in January 2027. Until then, call (310) 444-5217 and we'll arrange your consultation.

Back teeth, rebuilt without a post

With almost nothing left of the molar below, the usual plan would be a post and crown, or extraction and an implant. After immediate dentin sealing, the overlay was bonded with warmed composite, vibrated into place, forming a thick, durable resin seal.

No tooth above the gum, and no post

BondedOverlay5.5 years
Model of broken-down molar
Before Almost no tooth remaining.
Model of prepared molar
Model The sealed preparation.
Overlay on model
Overlay A precise bonded overlay.
Tooth sealed under rubber dam
Sealed Under rubber dam isolation.
Composite build-up
Base Composite replaces lost dentin.
Overlay bonded
Bonded Warmed composite, vibrated into place.
Final overlay
Result No post, no crown lengthening.
Overlay at 5.5 years
5.5 years Functioning perfectly.

A premolar and a second molar, the same way

BondedOverlay
X-ray of a root-treated premolar
Premolar Root-treated and heavily broken down.
Premolar before
Before Little tooth remaining.
Premolar after
After Rebuilt with bonding, no post or crown.
Molar under rubber dam
Molar Sealed and prepared.
Molar build-up
Build-up Dentin replaced with composite.
Molar overlay bonded
Bonded The overlay in place.

Porcelain or composite?

Both are excellent, and both can break. What matters is how they break. In fatigue testing on root-treated molars with a 3 mm overlay and no post, failures stayed within the restoration and the dentin seal held. A broken overlay can be replaced; the tooth underneath survives.

0 N400 N800 N1200 N1600 N050,000100,000150,000185,000Chewing cyclesLoad rises from 200 N to 1,400 N in stepsPorcelain overlays: all failed, average 1,147 N73% of composite overlays survived every cycleRoot-treated molars · 3 mm overlays · no posts · bond intact in all but one
Simulated chewing over yearsMagne & Knezevic, Quintessence Int 2009. Load rises in steps up to 1,400 N; 185,000 cycles.

Porcelain

  • Stronger and more wear-resistant
  • Keeps its colour and polish
  • Dr. Reshad's usual preference further back in the mouth
  • Stiffer, so in extreme overload a fracture can take tooth with it

Composite

  • Acts as a shock absorber and protects the root
  • Kind to opposing teeth and easy to repair
  • Useful nearer the front and for heavily compromised teeth
  • Wears and stains more over time
A milled composite overlay on its model
Overlay A milled composite overlay before bonding.
Amalgam replaced with composite onlay
Preparation An old amalgam replaced.
Composite onlay
Composite onlay Attractive and conservative.
Composite onlays after several years
Years later Stable because the bite was managed.
Part four

Front teeth that need a post

When too much is lost to bond alone, a post is still needed. The choice of post matters.

Ready to talk it through?

Our Beverly Hills office at 414 N. Camden Dr., Suite 750 opens in January 2027. Until then, call (310) 444-5217 and we'll arrange your consultation.

Fibre posts

Glass-fibre posts are tooth-coloured, translucent and bonded in place. They flex much like dentin, so stress is shared rather than concentrated in the root, and they transmit light beautifully. Where the destruction is not extreme, they are the preferred choice for front teeth. Cast posts still have their place when very little tooth remains.

Traditional · proven

Cast gold post and core

Custom-cast to fit the canal. Rigid and durable, for teeth with very little left.

Traditional

Ready-made metal post

Titanium or stainless steel. Far stiffer than tooth.

Modern

Glass-fibre post

Tooth-coloured, translucent and bonded. Flexes like dentin.

Modern

Custom-fitted fibre post

Relined to fit wide or oval canals without removing more tooth.

0 GPa30 GPa60 GPa90 GPa120 GPaYour dentinYour dentin: ≈ 18 GPa≈ 18 GPaGlass-fibre postGlass-fibre post: ≈ 30 GPa≈ 30 GPaMetal postMetal post: ≈ 109 GPa≈ 109 GPaMore flexible ← → Stiffer
How stiff each material isElastic modulus in GPa, lower is more flexible · fibre post review, 2023
Metal postBlocks light: a grey shadow can show at the gum lineAt the gum lineGlass-fibre postLets light through, like natural toothAt the gum line
Why colour matters at the frontIllustration built on a photograph of a natural incisor
Glass fibre posts
Fibre posts Colour-coded sizes, tooth-coloured.
Light transmission through restorations
Light Restorations that let light through look natural.
Natural front teeth in profile
Natural Translucent edges, like real enamel.
Fibre postMetal or cast post
40%60%80%100%SurvivalClinical study, 4 yearsFerrari et al. 20009% of cast-post roots fracturedClinical study, 4 years: Fibre 95%, Cast 84% (9% of cast-post roots fractured)Fibre 95%Cast 84%Pooled randomised trialsAverage 4.3 years · Tsintsadze 2024not statistically significantPooled randomised trials: Fibre 92.8%, Metal 78.1% (not statistically significant)Fibre 92.8%Metal 78.1%Randomised trial, 182 teeth15 years · Van Landuyt 2025not significant · more root fractures with metalRandomised trial, 182 teeth: Fibre 68.5%, Metal 53.6% (not significant · more root fractures with metal)Fibre 68.5%Metal 53.6%
Survival, fibre versus metal postsCompare within each row. Metal posts failed more often by root fracture.

A Cochrane review found the evidence too limited for firm conclusions, but trials since have leaned the same way: similar or better survival for fibre, and fewer root fractures. Case selection is what matters most.

Adhesion meets implants

Understanding materials and light lets bonded restorations sit alongside implants and natural teeth invisibly, even in the most demanding smiles.

Missing front tooth
Before A missing front tooth.
Treatment in progress
Treatment Implant and bonded restorations.
Final smile
Result Implant, bonded restorations and natural teeth, indistinguishable.
The evidence

What the research shows

2013 to 2026. Both approaches work; the long-term numbers, side by side.

Ready to talk it through?

Our Beverly Hills office at 414 N. Camden Dr., Suite 750 opens in January 2027. Until then, call (310) 444-5217 and we'll arrange your consultation.

Survival over time

Each study reports survival for its own patients, materials and length of follow-up, so the charts below compare trends rather than single numbers. Traditional gold, metal and crowns sit beside bonded and fibre-post restorations; back teeth are then set head to head.

Traditional: gold, metal, crownsBonded and fibre
40%50%60%70%80%90%100%05 yrs10 yrs15 yrs20 yrs25 yrsLength of follow-upSurvivalEtched porcelain onlays (retention): 100% at 4 years (Barghi 2002)Etched porcelain onlays (retention) · 100%Barghi 2002Lithium disilicate partial coverage: 93.7% at 3 years (Prott 2025)Lithium disilicate partial coverage · 93.7%Prott 2025Ceramic partial coverage, 7+ yrs: 97% at 7 years (Prott 2025)Ceramic partial coverage, 7+ yrs · 97%Prott 2025Endocrowns: 91.4% at 5 years (Al-Dabbagh 2021)Endocrowns · 91.4%Al-Dabbagh 2021Fibre posts: 92.8% at 4.3 years (Tsintsadze 2024)Fibre posts · 92.8%Tsintsadze 2024Fibre posts: 68.5% at 15 years (Van Landuyt 2025)Fibre posts · 68.5%Van Landuyt 2025Ceramic partial crowns: 53% at 20 years (Cieplik 2025)Ceramic partial crowns · 53%Cieplik 2025Full crowns: 98.3% at 5 years (Al-Dabbagh 2021)Full crowns · 98.3%Al-Dabbagh 2021Metal posts: 78.1% at 4.3 years (Tsintsadze 2024)Metal posts · 78.1%Tsintsadze 2024Metal posts: 53.6% at 15 years (Van Landuyt 2025)Metal posts · 53.6%Van Landuyt 2025Crowned root-treated teeth: 91.3% at 10 years (Landys Borén 2015)Crowned root-treated teeth · 91.3%Landys Borén 2015Gold partial crowns: 69% at 20 years (Cieplik 2025)Gold partial crowns · 69%Cieplik 2025Gold inlays: 73.4% at 25 years (Erpenstein 2001)Gold inlays · 73.4%Erpenstein 2001
Highlight:
Survival reported by each study, by length of follow-upEach dot is one study group. Studies differ in patients and design, so compare trends rather than single dots.
More conservative optionFull crown or cuspal coverage
60%70%80%90%100%SurvivalEndocrown vs full crownPooled studies · 5 years · Al-Dabbagh 2021not statistically significantEndocrown vs full crown: Endocrown 91.4%, Crown 98.3% (not statistically significant)Endocrown 91.4%Crown 98.3%Filling only vs crown, molarsRandomised trial · 3 years · Abu-Awwad 2025not significant (P = .061)Filling only vs crown, molars: Filling 76.7%, Crown 93.3% (not significant (P = .061))Filling 76.7%Crown 93.3%Cusps not covered vs covered420 teeth · 10 years · Landys Borén 2015cohort studyCusps not covered vs covered: Not covered 76%, Covered 91.3% (cohort study)Not covered 76%Covered 91.3%
Back teeth, head to headCompare within each row; studies differ in design and length.

The consistent message: back teeth that have lost their side walls need their cusps covered. Whether that is a bonded onlay, a gold onlay or a crown depends on the tooth.

Why you need a prosthodontist

Because Dr. Reshad practises both approaches every week, he has no reason to favour one. The traditional reconstruction and the bonded restoration are both tools; the right one depends on how much tooth is left, the quality of what remains, where the margins sit, your decay risk and, above all, your bite.

The bite is the most destructive force a restoration will face. Beautiful work that is not protected from it will not stay beautiful. Managing the bite, and fitting a night guard where there is grinding, is what keeps a result looking and working as it did on the day it was placed.

First

Is there a collar of healthy tooth, about 1.5 to 2 mm, all the way around?

No
If one can be createdOrthodontic extrusion or crown lengthening to expose sound tooth
If it cannotAn implant may be the better long-term choice; we will explain why
Yes
Healthy dentin, dry field, manageable biteBonded restoration: onlay, overlay, veneer or endocrown, often no post
Front tooth with too little left to bond aloneFibre post, bonded core and crown
Very little tooth left, especially back teethCast gold post and core, then a crown
Poor dentin, deep margins or high decay riskGold onlay or crown cemented, not dependent on bonding
In short

Is a post necessary? Sometimes. Your prosthodontist will know.

Every tooth is different. Wherever possible, Dr. Reshad preserves your natural tooth with bonded, biomimetic techniques. Where a tooth needs the strength of gold, a post or a crown, he uses those with the same care. Knowing which is which, and protecting the result with a well-managed bite, is the heart of prosthodontics.

“First, do the right thing. Then, do the thing right.”

Dr. William McHorris, 1986
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Not always. Bonding needs healthy dentin, a dry field and a manageable bite. Some teeth are too broken down, and for them a crown, a post or gold is the treatment that will actually save the tooth.

No. Gold onlays and crowns have some of the longest track records in dentistry, with restorations lasting decades. Their only real drawback is colour.

The root canal itself takes very little strength. The weakness comes from tooth already lost to decay, cracks or old fillings, which is why how the tooth is rebuilt matters so much.

It can happen. When it does, it usually breaks within the restoration and leaves the tooth intact, so it can be repaired or replaced rather than losing the tooth.

Yes, significantly. Grinding is one of the strongest predictors of failure for any restoration. We assess your bite first and will usually recommend a night guard.

Not if it is doing its job. Removing a post can risk the root, so we only do it if the tooth needs retreatment or the restoration has failed.

Medically reviewed by Dr. Mamaly Reshad, BDS (Lond), MSc (Lond), Cert Pros (USC), Prosthodontist — Last reviewed July 2026

Research referenced

Evidence reviewed September 2026. Adapted from Dr. Reshad's lecture “Is a Post Necessary?”, first presented in 2013.

  1. Guzy GE, Nicholls JI. In vitro comparison of intact endodontically treated teeth with and without endo-post reinforcement. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42:39.
  2. Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod 1989;15:512.
  3. Simonsen RJ. New materials on the horizon. JADA 1991;122:24.
  4. Magne P, Douglas WH. Quintessence Int 2000;31:5.
  5. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 2000;13:15B.
  6. Erpenstein H, Kerschbaum T, Halfin T. Long-term survival of cast-gold inlays in a specialized dental practice. Clin Oral Investig 2001.
  7. Barghi N, Berry TG. Clinical evaluation of etched porcelain onlays: a 4-year report. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2002;23:657.
  8. Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:503.
  9. Goodacre CJ et al. Clinical complications in fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:31.
  10. Donovan T, Simonsen RJ, Guertin G, Tucker RV. Retrospective clinical evaluation of 1,314 cast gold restorations in service from 1 to 52 years. J Esthet Restor Dent 2004;16:194.
  11. Bolla M et al. Root canal posts for the restoration of root filled teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007.
  12. Magne P, So WS, Cascione D. Immediate dentin sealing supports delayed restoration placement. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:166.
  13. Magne P, Knezevic A. Simulated fatigue resistance of composite resin versus porcelain CAD/CAM overlay restorations on endodontically treated molars. Quintessence Int 2009;40:125.
  14. Scotti N et al. Fibre post insertion under indirect composite onlays in endodontically treated molars. J Dent 2012;40:814.
  15. Landys Borén D, Jonasson P, Kvist T. Long-term survival of endodontically treated teeth at a public dental specialist clinic. J Endod 2015.
  16. Raedel M et al. Survival of teeth treated with cast post and cores over up to 19.5 years. J Prosthet Dent 2015.
  17. Naumann M et al. “Ferrule comes first. Post is second!” A systematic review. J Endod 2018;44:212.
  18. Al-Dabbagh RA. Survival and success of endocrowns: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2021;125(3).
  19. Al-Dabbagh RA et al. Effect of a circumferential ferrule on fibre-post restored teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2024;132(6).
  20. Tsintsadze N et al. Glass-fibre-reinforced versus metal posts: systematic review and meta-analyses. J Prosthet Dent 2024.
  21. Prott LS et al. Survival and complications of partial coverage restorations on posterior teeth. J Esthet Restor Dent 2025;37:620.
  22. Van Landuyt KL et al. Glass-fiber versus metal posts in single-crowned teeth: 15-year follow-up of a randomized trial. J Dent 2025.
  23. Abu-Awwad M et al. Direct restorations versus full crowns in endodontically treated molars: a three-year randomized trial. J Dent 2025.
  24. Cieplik F et al. Gold vs. CAD/CAM ceramic partial crowns: 20-year randomized clinical study. Dent Mater 2025.

Clinical photographs are from Dr. Reshad's own cases. Diagrams are simplified for clarity. This page is general information, not a diagnosis. Every case is planned around one person's anatomy, and individual results vary.

Ready to Transform Your Smile?

Schedule a private consultation with Dr. Reshad to discuss your goals and explore your options.